Hey,

So I’ve been hanging out for blackfriday to get two 2TB SSDs to replace my two 2TB HDDs that I ripped out of some old Sky HD boxes many years ago (you can hear them ticking away when I use them.

I primarily use them for general data storage, videos, music, pictures, backups of my software exes, documents etc, and in my recent years music production sample packs, drum kits, VSTs etc.

I have already just about filled one drive and am about half way through another.

Now I was thinking of replacing them for SSDs to improve data access when needed, currently Amazon has an SSD for roughly £74, but I have also recently seen that 4tb seagate barracuda drives are £75.

Onlything I’m worried about with the HDD is the mechanical aspect, IE life expectancy but what worries me about the SSD is the nature of the data storage not being as secure as HDDs (read that SSDs electrically store data rather than physically.

So in your opinion would you rather the two SSDs of the same storage size for improved speeds or two 4tb HDDs to improve storage space?

  • @Sopel97B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    EDIT: was thinking Firecuda as they are SMR rather than the CMR barracuda, so read that SMR drivers are considered to be better.

    read again

    • @JufindaOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      My bad, I’ve mixed them up, thanks for mentioning that