• bradleycjwB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still don’t understand this whole clear and obvious error requirement. If the ref misses something, then VAR should intervene and inform the referee to relook at the incident. If he deems his original decision correct, then we move on.

    The fact that it’s an error but VAR doesn’t see it as clear and obvious and opts not to direct the ref to the monitor is so weird.

    • NotARealDeveloperB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      VAR worked perfectly well in the Bundesliga. Just like you said. Then suddenly this new requirement comes from PL which is absolutely dumb.

      The only explanation for me is match fixing.

    • chi_sweetness25
      cake
      B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So stop the game for every potential nothing foul at midfield? Or every time a common foul is called when it’s a borderline yellow? As it is, some people are already on the side of VAR being too intrusive and killing game flow, while others want it to intervene more often. You can see how it’s tricky to find the right balance.

    • sirSADABYB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ref may have said to VAR he saw the challenge and whatever and whatever and feels it’s okay. In which case it’s not clear AND obvious error. If the ref said he didn’t see whatever whatever in his explication then it’s clear and obvious he has missed something.