• snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I was commenting about how it was implemented on a straight street with no obvious considerations for the lanes
    going into the spaces where cars are parked. Just about how they did it on this specific street, and not about comparative safety.

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        I was extremely clear about what my point was. Do you assume I ‘really mean’ something other than what I wrote?

        • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          28 days ago

          I was hoping your point was something other than “I don’t understand it, so I’m dumb”, but thank you for clarifying.

          • snooggums@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            If you still think I don’t understand that chicanes are good but that I am criticizing this specific one then your reading comprehension sucks.

            • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              28 days ago

              Again, just because you can’t see how it’s beneficial doesn’t mean it’s not!

              Chicans don’t always need physical curbs or other means! Today YOU learned! Neat eh?

              Physical curbs are what would CAUSE someone to hit that black truck, but clearly you and other people who think they’ll just plow into the back of it, probably shouldn’t have a license.

              Also, who’s cares if a parked car gets it? No one is injured, and guess what, it’s its OWN barrier itself! Neat eh!

              • snooggums@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                Where did I say that there should be curbs? You keep responding as if Isaid anything about speed bumps or curbs when I never did.

                Learn to read.

                • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  I was the one talking about speed bumps, and a common feature of Chicanes are curbs or other physical obstructions.

                  So if you aren’t talking about speed bumps like my comment was, and you don’t want a physical barrier… the hell is your point?

                  We can read, you are just absolute shit at making your point mate.

                  • snooggums@piefed.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    27 days ago

                    I was commenting about how it was implemented on a straight street with no obvious considerations for the lanes going into the spaces where cars are parked.

                    That isn’t clear? They could have put some kind of paint at the curves to indicate where cars shouldn’t park, or anything other than just painting the lanes. That is what makes it look like a shitty implementation.

                    Next time you should ask what someone means if simple words are too much for you.