• Aurix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Deranged to spend the money on a case where you don’t even know what you get. I chose to pay a much more reasonable $50 for a Valorant knife. Elden Ring’s production value is great, but have you seen these 5 animations?

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Id rather not because anytime the children argument is used it feels like government officials see it as an opportunity to further infringe upon privacy. Would probably push for real ids online and having to give identification cards to companies to play games. And not like companies are known for the best security practices.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fuck them kids. This is a scam perpetrated against adults. They’re the ones with fat wallets ready to be siphoned.

      Games making you value arbitrary nonsense. That is what makes them games. There is no ethical form of attaching a real-world price tag to that fiction.

      • cooljacob204@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That is simply not true, why would you think that? Lots of young teans and kids play cs. My entire friends group were into cs and the genre starting at around 12.

        When I use to play many years ago anytime I smurfed my matches were full of kids.

        • Nuggsy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I 2nd this. I was playing CS 1.6 around that age. Although lootboxes weren’t a thing back then and you could download and use your own skins from sites like gamebanana and have custom sprays…

          Sometimes, I miss the older days. Just with better internet.

  • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    I can’t see any proof for these numbers. The link in the article didn’t say how they came to the conclusions they did.

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      https://csgocasetracker.com/monthly#faq

      It’s a guesstimate based on what looks like public information. With valve not disclosing the numbers and profiles being able to hide the number that is the best you can do. Wish they would include some type of confidence interval but that’s probably too much work.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Only legislation will stop this.

    This is the dominant strategy. You were never going to shop your way out of it. It’s in every genre, every price point, every platform. It’s in single-player games. If we allow this to continue, there will be nothing else.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Nobody put a gun to your head” will never excuse exploiting people for money.

        This business model is inherently abusive, and spreading. I don’t fucking care how little you think anyone needs what it offers. I am explaining why it’s a scam. Nobody should be offered this. They are victims.

          • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Which is why many of these things are regulated, especially if they include addictive substances.

              • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                As of 2022, 54 countries had implemented special taxes on sugary drinks and/or sugar in general: https://www.obesityevidencehub.org.au/collections/prevention/countries-that-have-implemented-taxes-on-sugar-sweetened-beverages-ssbs

                In many cases that covers sweets, snacks, etc. as well. Food is usually quite heavily regulated (in the sense that there’s lots of regulation, not that it’s actually strict or as much as it should be), even if it’s not immediately obvious to us as consumers. E.g. there are ingredients that get banned because of being addictive or having certain harmful effects.

                Porn is age gated worldwide, and in some cases censored. I’d class that as regulated pretty much all over the world, regardless of how hard/easy it is to circumvent the regulations (e.g. for a 17-year-old to access a porn website).

                I think that actually covers all of the items in the list!

          • ShustOne@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Many of these are regulated and require disclosures to the user. I’d like to see win chances for each item tier disclosed as part of opening a crate. They do this in other countries.

            Food items require ingredient lists and nutritional information and are subject to many regulations as food in general. Many countries tax sugary items with little nutritional value. Alcohol requires ABV displayed on the bottle and is heavily regulated behind ID laws. Porn probably has the laziest end user regulations but other regulations have happened to prevent abuse within the production of porn.

            My teenage nephews play CS and can all buy keys to unlock cases with no age verification.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              As he can buy almost everything else apart from alcohol.

              Sure, seeing information, be it nutrition in food or odds in games is nice, but doesn’t fix anything. We should demand to ban most of those things outright.

              • ShustOne@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                We’re in strong whaboutism territory though. We can look to regulate and fix gambling in gaming without having to examine every regulation problem out there. I think we all agree that gambling mechanics in games are not healthy for people and currently face almost no rules at all.

                • msage@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  All I’m saying is that regulation does not solve the problem.

                  I may have been involved in the gambling scene and no amount of regulation solves anything. Not taxes, not self-limiting options. It does not do anything.

                  And I’m actually suprised how people act like regulations help with the issues. The problems remain, just are slightly less predatory. Wohoo, we did it!

          • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes and people have been complaining about the abuses these companies do with all of these for the longest time. At least all of those have some use unlike loot boxes and other microtransactions.

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    You mean the one and only corporation that truly cares about its users? /s

    How anyone doesn’t think they’re as shitty as any other company of similar size is beyond me.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Amazing, they deleted CSGO from the universe, then released the worst possible followup they could have made, and yet still made money. Amazing.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t be hyperbolic. New releases have issues and CS2 issues are nowhere near how horrible CSGO was when it released. It’s by no means the worst followup and the reason you lost CSGO is so you could get your skins to CS2. Would you have preferred if all your skins would’ve been left behind into CSGO? Most people wouldn’t.

      Valve did good enough with CS2 which is why it’s making money and will continue to make money.

      • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        At this time about half a year after release they still have significant graphical bugs. Which means the skins you may have bought in GO appear worse in 2. When GO was released they left Source available and people are still using it.