• nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    and I assume it’s going to be in the cheapest ways possible even though they have microsoft money.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why let humans at Obsidian make Bethesda look bad when they can save money by using AI to make themselves look bad?

  • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ll copy my comment from another thread:

    Imagine if they made a deal with Larian to make another installment in the franchise (not Fallout 5, just something like New Vegas by Obsidian). How cool would that be? They specialize in turn-based, top-down RPGs and would fit perfectly.

    I know Larian also takes time to polish their games but if they started now and Bethesda some time after, then we would have two very distinct Fallout games with possibly not too much break between them.

  • cyr0catdrag0nz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah with how starfield turned out this isn’t the right thing to say imo. Nobody wants these games rushed out. Bethesda games were made with love and care, once.