• Pixel@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    the UI for GIMP is so horrifically bad that I basically refuse to use it. Not like, on principal or anything, if it improves i’d be happy to give it a shot, but because every experience I’ve had with it has been pretty immediately negative, and finding solutions to problems I have seems more effort than its worth. I want gimp to be good, it’s a mature piece of software with a lot going for it, but it also feels like its design is kind of up its own ass, in a sense? It’s weird.

    • livus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Having spent ages trying to adopt it and failing like 20+ years ago it’s just crazy to me that every time I give it another chance, it still doesn’t have non destructive editing and is still a non-intuitive UI from hell. It feels like they want it to be like this.

      • yistdaj@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        They’ve been working on GIMP 3.0 for over a decade, which has non-destructive editing, as well as an upgrade to the UI toolkit (although actual UI changes are still to-do). They don’t want it to be this way, development has just been insanely slow. Mostly due to lack of developers and donations, although that has been changing recently.

        They planned to have GIMP 3.0 out by May, but with so many delays it might be a few months yet.

        • livus@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Good to know, will keep a watch for it.

          I really want to use it but always end up closing it in frustration and firing up photoshop.