• filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Can someone ELI5 how this isn’t recognised as a terrorism?

    Notwithstanding this flood of official condemnations, the authorities do not appear to be in any hurry to bring the perpetrators to justice; only one person was arrested in the aftermath of the attack, and subsequently released. Settler impunity has long been the norm: according to data from the Israeli human rights group Yesh Din, 97 percent of police files opened into cases of settler violence since 2005 have been closed without convictions.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      In Israel it’s because Israel as a state actively supports settlements. This is why Palestinians don’t just shoot settlers; when you do that the IDF comes.

      Outside Israel it’s because that would he “antisemitism”.

      • rolandtb303@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        More specifically, it’s the definition of antisemitism that the zionist lobby wants you to believe. Standing up for a people’s right is somehow hateful for the other group yet they don’t bat an eye to actual, true antisemitism. That’s because when the IHRA definition was adopted, pro-Palestinian movements are now defined as antisemitism in the reports, resulting in a massive sea of noise, resulting in actual antisemitism cases being looked at much less.

        Funny how a foreign lobby claiming to fight antisemitism ironically has cases where actual antisemites aren’t prosecuted for their crimes.