• QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    If China is so great then why does it feel the need to dictate over Hong Kong and Taiwan?

    It doesn’t. Taiwan and Hong Kong ARE China. If anything the high level of autonomy that China allows reactionary regional governments to have is what should be criticized.

    Does China have gay marriage? Trans rights perhaps?

    China allows for civil unions for LGBTQ. https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1162943.shtml It made civil unions legal across the nation before USA made gay marriage legal in every state. Like all places in the world (some more than others) China has a long way to go on LGBTQ rights. But that’s just it, China is improving along those lines, while the US is rapidly regressing. China is improving with trans rights and has been punishing companies that violate them. So yes, we should absolutely support China in continuing to move in the correct direction.

    It’s a nation state (a far too big one at that), which are by definition tools of oppression.

    Lol, by whose definition? A state is only as good or bad as the ruling class that wields it. A bourgeois (capitalist) state will always be oppressive. As a socialist state (and China is a socialist state), the CPC uses its power to suppress the constant attempts of the bourgeois to oppress the working class.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Taiwan and Hong Kong ARE China

      Imperialism much?

      China is improving along those lines, while the US is rapidly regressing

      That’s fair, but it’s once again an argument based entirely on comparing China to the US. The US being bad doesn’t make China good. To get back to my original argument, I’m just saying that the word ‘tankie’ refers to China or Russia simps. There is no nation in this world worth simping for.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Imperialism much?

        It is imperialism to let proxy governments for the UK and US maintain a colonial foothold in China actually.

        • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          So the Taiwanese all desperately want to join the DPRC? Last I checked Taiwan was a sovereign nation. Capitalism has a foothold there but the British no longer rule there. Justifying imperialism with imperialism also doesn’t magically make it okay

          • Kieselguhr [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Last I checked Taiwan was a sovereign nation.

            Please, check again picard

            Disputes about Taiwan’s sovereignty is the most famous fact about Taiwan. You are deeply unserious.

            • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Okay I may have worded that wrong but that is also misleading. China is a huge power (I say this is a problem as you may recall). Having diplomatic ties with China is necessary for most nations. China refuses to have diplomatic ties with anyone who recognizes Taiwan as a sovereign nation. So, everybody pretends they don’t recognize it, officially. In reality Taiwan has its own government and isn’t ruled over by China. In 1991, Taiwan/ROC even recognized the DPRC.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Capitalism has a foothold there but the British no longer rule there. Justifying imperialism with imperialism also doesn’t magically make it okay

            No they just installed a friendly neocolonial government. Jesus Christ do some basic investigation. If the British invaded part of your hometown and installed a puppet government, would you call it imperialism for it to be taken back by your town?

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                So your argument is the geographical boundaries mean when a country is split it is imperialism to unite it again?

                Imagine if the confederacy retreated to the keys islands, that’s sort of the level of ridiculous here. The right wing losers of a civil war retreated to an island that was and is considered part of the country.

                • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I would go even further. If a country exists and everybody has a national identity, all happy citizens. Then one region decides to become separatist. If the rest of the country doesn’t let them separate, I would qualify that as imperialism as well.

                  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Have you read anything on what imperialism actually is?

                    I would suggest reading Lenin’s “Imperialism”

      • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Imperialism much?

        Wut? Oh, you think that’s imperialism? Stating the fact that Taiwan is part of China and that Hong Kong is also just a region (SAR if you even know what that is) of China? All this shows is you have no fucking clue what imperialism even is. You literally don’t know what that word means. Not by ML standards clearly, but not even by general layman standards. And it shows you know absolutely nothing about the history of this situation, which is typical of the sinophobic liberal. Taiwan is ran by a fascist nationalist government that tried to wipe out the workers movements and that still claims to be the “rightful” rulers not only of all of China but also other sovereign nations like Mongolia. And you’re saying that China allowing them to continue to operate while slowly working towards future reunification is “imperialism.” That’s just sick. Take a look at what the US via the IMF and World Bank does to impoverished global south nations (that are impoverished solely because the US impoverished them for the purpose of subjugation and unequal exchange) to begin to understand what imperialism looks like. Then come back and tell me China’s lenient position on Taiwan is “imperialism.”

        The US being bad doesn’t make China good.

        Never said it did. BUT part of why China is good is because it is overtaking the US which is unambiguously bad. This is one of the many things China is doing (in this case passively, but it does a hell of a lot of active good too) that is beneficial to humanity.

        There is no nation in this world worth simping for.

        I don’t know what you think “simping” for a country even means, given it’s a slang term involving romantic attraction, but if by “simping” for a nation, you mean “expressing vocal approval and ideologically supporting it,” then yes, there are nations absolutely worth “simping” for. Cuba immediately comes to mind as the obvious one. But China also deserves the vocal approval and support of leftists since it is in fact a socialist state and is in fact doing much good in the world, both for the masses of people living within it as well as for most of the rest of the world through BRI and the fact that it is undermining the actual imperialist’s ability to beat the global south into submission. Russia deserves critical support for the latter bit as well, seeing as it is doing more than any other state to actively fight imperialism and the monopolarity of US hegemony.