u_koolman631 reported this first, but I thought it’s worth a full post. I also tried to add more details.

Nacua’s injury happened on the pass interference he drew (https://theramswire.usatoday.com/2023/11/20/rams-puka-nacua-injury-shoulder-seahawks-update/). The pass interference occurred in the fourth quarter with 8:09 left.

Nacua’s plays after the pass interference:

  • - 6:43 Catch made, gain of 32 yards
  • - 5:46 Incomplete pass intended for Nacua
  • - 3:36 Catch made, gain of 11 yards
  • - 2:00 Nacua rushed for 7 yards
  • - 1:47 Incomplete pass intended for Nacua

The Rams didn’t have the ball after 1:34. So, I know anything is possible, but I thought this looked WAY better than initial news. He not only ended the game but was involved pretty heavily. I mean, if your WR1(b?) is hurt in a serious way, would you let him rush?

  • blckorderB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    would you let him rush?

    Didn’t the Rams make Stafford play WR after he hurt his hand?