- 이전 포스팅에서 텐서G3 성능 문제를 다뤘는데 구글 텐서 설계 주체는 가설에 영향을 크게 주는 요소인데 너무 대충다룬 느낌이었음. ( 구글 텐서G3 CPU 성능 이슈 분석. (Tensor G3, S5P9865) ) 그래서 이를 명확히 하고자 추가 정보를 체크해봄. - 확인 가능한 정보. (공식 표기는 텐서, 텐서G2, 텐서G3지만 여기서는 텐서1,2,3로 표기하겠음.) 삼성 텐서1,2,3 시스템 레벨 캐시 아키텍처, 마이크로 아키텍처(CPU?), RTL 디자인. 텐서3 인터커넥트, 메모리 서브 시스템 아키텍처. CPU를 포함한 주요 부분 프론트 엔드를 작업한 것으로 추정. 구글 pre/post silicon validation 구글 텐서 GPU RTL 디자인. 구글 텐서1,2,3 CPU, 시스템 레벨..
Why didnt Samsung get feedback from Google in the CPU design development process? I’m guessing Google wanted a specific function in the CPU and Samsung delivered it with a flaw.
It seems there is a chronic problem at Samsung with soc/fab development my guess is that people underestimate how godly hard it is to build a soc/fab company from scratch.
It is not easy to make the brains of a computer. Ram/SSD/display is child’s play compared to an soc.
If I was the chairman at Samsung, I would get talent from across the world for the Fab and exynos division.
Sigh…they should just get an American to develop an exynos chip and branch it off.
Why didnt Samsung get feedback from Google in the CPU design development process? I’m guessing Google wanted a specific function in the CPU and Samsung delivered it with a flaw.
It seems there is a chronic problem at Samsung with soc/fab development my guess is that people underestimate how godly hard it is to build a soc/fab company from scratch. It is not easy to make the brains of a computer. Ram/SSD/display is child’s play compared to an soc.
If I was the chairman at Samsung, I would get talent from across the world for the Fab and exynos division.
Sigh…they should just get an American to develop an exynos chip and branch it off.