@Stiven_CrysisB to Apple@hardware.watchEnglish • 7 months agoApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro review - Efficiency before performancewww.notebookcheck.netexternal-linkmessage-square116arrow-up11arrow-down12cross-posted to: gadgets@hardware.watch
arrow-up1-1arrow-down1external-linkApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro review - Efficiency before performancewww.notebookcheck.net@Stiven_CrysisB to Apple@hardware.watchEnglish • 7 months agomessage-square116cross-posted to: gadgets@hardware.watch
minus-square@MC_chromeBlinkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months agoI don’t see how redesigning the band connector will lead to improved battery life…
minus-square@ShaidarHaran2BlinkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months agoIn a small device like the watch, the attachment mechanism and all the structure needed for it takes substantial space where every millimeter is at a premium
minus-square@MC_chromeBlinkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months ago all the structure needed for it takes substantial space where every millimeter is at a premium The rumored magnetic system that the Apple Watch X is supposed to be using does not look like it will be saving much space at all, if any.
I don’t see how redesigning the band connector will lead to improved battery life…
In a small device like the watch, the attachment mechanism and all the structure needed for it takes substantial space where every millimeter is at a premium
The rumored magnetic system that the Apple Watch X is supposed to be using does not look like it will be saving much space at all, if any.