Talented? Yes. But it’s not revisionist history to acknowledge that his defense was awful and although his offense very good, it was not elite. Even at his peak, he was a poor man’s Dame.
To me, Chauncey is the bigger “what if he stayed?” than Marbury.
Talented? Yes. But it’s not revisionist history to acknowledge that his defense was awful and although his offense very good, it was not elite. Even at his peak, he was a poor man’s Dame.
To me, Chauncey is the bigger “what if he stayed?” than Marbury.