@Lusamommy to Conservative@lemm.ee • 7 months agoMore than 3,000 auto dealers sign letter opposing Biden's electric vehicle mandatewww.foxbusiness.commessage-square32arrow-up12arrow-down112
arrow-up1-10arrow-down1external-linkMore than 3,000 auto dealers sign letter opposing Biden's electric vehicle mandatewww.foxbusiness.com@Lusamommy to Conservative@lemm.ee • 7 months agomessage-square32
minus-square@spacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink3•7 months agoIt’s hard to gouge your customers in the name of “service” when the number of moving parts on the vehicle are drastically reduced. Hardly surprising that they’d rail against something that cuts into their profits.
minus-square@Lookin4GoodArgs@lemm.eelinkfedilink3•7 months agoWarning: Rule 3, Bad Faith Comment You immediately jumped to accusing them of being conspiratorial without asking them to explain their reasoning.
minus-square@LusamommyOPlinkfedilink-2•7 months agoHe made his argument perfectly clear. I don’t know why I’m not allowed to criticize it
minus-square@spacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink3•7 months agoIt’s not a conspiracy. More moving parts = more service = more money. Less moving parts = less service = less money. Care to be an ass about anything else?
minus-square@LusamommyOPlinkfedilink-5•7 months agoSo? You’re still peddling utterly baseless conspiracies. The only ass here is you
minus-square@spacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink0•7 months agoEverything I said is logical and an easy conclusion to come to if you know anything about vehicles. Come up with a counter argument instead of slinging insults. This is why nobody takes conservatives seriously. Grow a wrinkle and get back to me.
minus-square@LusamommyOPlinkfedilink-2•7 months agoJust saying your conclusions are logical doesn’t make them so
minus-square@spacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink1•7 months agoI’ve already shown you, broken down quite nicely for even the smoothest of brains to understand. I’m not sure why I’m engaging with you at all, however; you don’t engage in good faith regardless of what I write. I could splash you in the face with water and tell you you’re wet, and you’d still call me a liar. You seriously need to grow the fuck up.
It’s hard to gouge your customers in the name of “service” when the number of moving parts on the vehicle are drastically reduced. Hardly surprising that they’d rail against something that cuts into their profits.
Running out of foil for that hat?
Warning: Rule 3, Bad Faith Comment
You immediately jumped to accusing them of being conspiratorial without asking them to explain their reasoning.
He made his argument perfectly clear. I don’t know why I’m not allowed to criticize it
It’s not a conspiracy.
More moving parts = more service = more money. Less moving parts = less service = less money.
Care to be an ass about anything else?
So? You’re still peddling utterly baseless conspiracies. The only ass here is you
Everything I said is logical and an easy conclusion to come to if you know anything about vehicles.
Come up with a counter argument instead of slinging insults. This is why nobody takes conservatives seriously. Grow a wrinkle and get back to me.
Just saying your conclusions are logical doesn’t make them so
I’ve already shown you, broken down quite nicely for even the smoothest of brains to understand.
I’m not sure why I’m engaging with you at all, however; you don’t engage in good faith regardless of what I write.
I could splash you in the face with water and tell you you’re wet, and you’d still call me a liar.
You seriously need to grow the fuck up.