Obviously, we won this game because our Defense played amazing. D-line, Linebackers, and secondary all played lights out. Eberflus is an idiot, but didn’t cower in the final minutes of the game like he did against detriot and called a good defense.
My question is, if Eberflus gets fired, what do we do with the coordination of the defense? I know some people have thrown the idea of demoting Flus to DC but has that ever happened in the history of the league? To me its either he stays or goes with no in between.
Do you think we keep the Tampa 2 style since it’s worked out the past couple weeks? Who would you want as our DC if we do switch to a new staff, and what scheme do you want them to call?
If we do move on from Eberflus, I personally would want an Offensive Minded Coach. If we keep Justin, then hey, let’s give the guy a full coaching staff that can help unlock what Getsy has clearly failed to do, with the guy at the top having a clear idea of how offenses are created. If we draft a new Qb, all the more reason to. But that leaves the DC spot all the more interesting, especially with how good they’ve played recently.
I mean, generally, sure, he’s not an idiot if you compare him to everyone. It takes a lot of mental talent to even get into the nfl, let alone make it to the top, and I don’t doubt he knows the technical ins and out of football.
My point is that all the qualities of a smart head coach you’d want to see, he lacks in.
Time Management: Awful, many examples throughout his tenure Penalties: Top 5 in NFL this year Situational Awareness: Awful, see Detriot game Media Presence: Embarrassing! Guy cannot answer questions without getting lost in his own words. Hirings: Obviously, Luke Getsy is not the guy. But hiring a guy who is now under investigation from the FBI is still a terrible knock.
Smart NFL coaches are made by these factors, and when he lacks these qualities time and time again, it’s fair to call them out. We are constantly mocked by NFL announcers, reporters, and analysts for the product on AND off the field. To do that takes true incompetence. In layman’s terms, being an idiot