The ruling refers to two specific matches and the absence of images of certain plays. The already famous Valencia-Real Madrid match suffered the censorship of some of the VAR images, especially those that led to the sending off of Vinicius, as the VAR only showed the aggression of the Real Madrid player, but did not broadcast the rest of the images in which the Real Madrid player was assaulted and, as a result, in his attempt to free himself, he defended himself from the previous aggression he had received. The conclusion leaves no room for doubt. “The images were biased by the VAR assistant”, who was Iglesias Villanueva.
The second loophole found by the court refers to the absence of any decisive image regarding Atlético de Madrid’s phantom goal against Espanyol, which led to the relegation of the Catalan team. “There were images that made it doubtful whether or not the ball had entered the goal completely and they were not broadcast”. The VAR referee was José Luis González González.
This post is an automated archive from a submission made on /r/soccer, powered by Fediverser software running on alien.top. Responses to this submission will not be seen by the original author until they claim ownership of their alien.top account. Please consider reaching out to them let them know about this post and help them migrate to Lemmy.
Lemmy users: you are still very much encouraged to participate in the discussion. There are still many other subscribers on !main@soccer.forum that can benefit from your contribution and join in the conversation.
Reddit users: you can also join the fediverse right away by getting by visiting https://portal.alien.top. If you are looking for a Reddit alternative made for and by an independent community, check out Fediverser.