• ShumonyuB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Duncan is a defensive all-timer but people give him way too much credit for the Spurs offensive success. Their offense took off when their offense starting featuring more Ginobili and Parker, when Duncan was the lead guy their offenses were actually pretty average.

    Players like David Robinson, and Garnett get so much criticism for their offensive limitations but Duncan never seems to be viewed the same way. I think his outside shooting percentages, lack of rim pressure, and limited playmaking makes him a much more flawed offensive player than people would think.

    The graph at the end of this video does a good job illustrating this point, the spurs outscored teams by around 9 points per 100 with Ginobili and no Duncan, with no Ginobili, and Duncan on the court they were outscored by around 3 points per 100 from 2004-2008. Ginobili deserves way more credit for the Spurs success.

    • Swimming-Bad3512B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have always said this, Tim Duncan the Offensive Player is overrated.

      His Offensive limitations is also why the author of Thinking Basketball doesn’t quite think that Duncan has a case as a GOAT Candidate