So, with DTR at QB, we get 1 of four results.

Result A: DTR stinks up the joint, PJ walker comes in at some point and replaces him, no playoffs, a wasted season. Maybe you keep DTR as a developmental prospect, maybe you cut ties. We wait for Deshaun and Chubb to come back and get revenge on the AFC North. You recruit another later round QB, or maybe sign a veteran, because options are limited much of the cap being used and there isn’t enough draft capital.

Result B: DTR does OK, not great, back into the playoffs, but wildcard defeat. You keep DTR on the squad and continue to develop. Watson comes back, you consider 2023 a wash, and reload for 2024. No real change in free agency or draft tactics. Maybe get a vet as a better 2nd option on the cheap.

Result C: DTR freaking BALLS OUT. Late run into the playoffs, maybe super bowl, maybe conference loss, at least one playoff win. Now you have an actual problem. As old saying goes, “If you have 2 QBs you really have none”. Trading DTR would be insane and not received well, Trading Watson with the contract, and not much draft capital to unload even half the contract - this option is nearly untenable. If you keep both - you risk splitting the locker room.

Result D: DTR stinks up the joint, Flacco (or someone) comes in and gets to the playoffs, but not a deep run. This becomes “Result B” with extra steps.

What does the brain trust think?

  • sallrightB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like your “BALLS OUT” scenario (which is somehow about DTR and not Watson).

    Even in that scenario, Watson is 100% coming back because he would need to get showcased in order to get traded.