I’m convinced that as I age (61), my ability to decided between what should sound better interferes with what sounds better to my hears. I’ve EQ my setup with a MiniDSP. The frequency response is shown in Green and roughly +/- 3 dB. The response without EQ is shown in RED. The miniDSP is obviously doing its job in flatting out the response. However, the EQed response sounds dull and lifeless and I much prefer the sound of response through the MiniDSP without any filtering applied. Has anyone had the same experience with EQing to a flat response.

  • mourning_wood_againB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think you like a V or U shaped response. It’s a big club. I think people are over analyzing here.

    • clock_watcherB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. You can obsess over flat frequency response results, but you don’t listen to graphs.

      My personal listening preferences line up closely to the Harman curve, so a boosted bass and warm rolled off upper frequencies. I’d likely much prefer OP’s EQd setup.

      OP’s non-EQd results are textbook V shaped, which plenty of people enjoy. Neither one is better than the other for subjective enjoyment. Go with what you like.