https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqkUkQyhBbc

Some interesting thoughts. First, it’s about the same length as a Telluride, but the wheelbase is a lot longer, they shifted the wheels further apart to focus on interior space, so that could make this punch above its weight and feel more like a full-size inside.

Base power for $56,000 is actually pretty underwhelming, only 215 horsepower with a RWD setup that gets 230 miles. You can upgrade to extended range for 300+ miles, or you can upgrade to AWD which gets you 380 horsepower and 280 miles. Definitely better, but it’s no Mach-E GT (though to be fair, it’s not really trying to be.)

I think really my main criticism is just that it’s still way too expensive. This starts at $56,000, and yes there will certainly be rebates, but a Telluride starts at the mid $36,000 range and its competitors like the Pilot and Highlander also start under $40,000. We’re still in this same problem period where the EV version of a gas vehicle is like 30-50% more expensive, so you have to not only be willing to commit to EV, you have to be willing to commit enough to spend $20,000 more for the privilege.

The GT-Line especially that he reviews is around $75,000, putting it up against the Rivian R1S and Model X, but also pretty close to traditional high-luxury SUV’s like the Escalade, and obviously this will be cheaper to run than an Escalade, but my point is just that you can get a lot of amenities around the $80,000 range, and I’m not sure how many people would be willing to spend this much…for a Kia.

  • spiketeamB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doug’s scoring falls apart for normal cars.

    This scored the highest Weekend category score in its category. And the lowest Daily category lowest score.

    Just what buyers of this class of vehicle are looking for.