He has career averages of 17/10, and was a critical piece on a Finals team. Yet you can’t help but feel like he’s been a huge disappointment relative to his draft position.

In a vacuum, meaning ignoring who he was drafted over, is Ayton a bust for a #1 pick?

  • legend023B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the #1 pick

    Has he gotten better since his 2nd season? That answers your question right there, and usually a first overall pick should be on his first team more than 5 years (unless he forces himself out)

  • jbenson255B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disappointment relative to what was expected from him but he’s not a bust

  • referee-superfanB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Near all star isn’t really a bust. He’s overpaid and not necessarily what people want out of a number 1 pick. But he could realistically contribute on a contender and has been a good part of a finals appearance.

  • angel2timezB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can see him easily having a 12+ career which is far from bust. You guys are comparing him to luka. 17/10 is great career numbers lol

  • agk927B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Wtf lol, you can’t call a good player a bust

  • JoeTheHoeB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a bust, just not an all star. The issue really is that his skillset isn’t really what you need at his position. In a different era, things may have gone a lot better for him.

  • horeahekaB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There should really be a clear definition for bust. To me Ayton is underperforming for a number 1 pick. He is not in the same category as Anthony Bennet or Olawakandi and if he had been picked 6th or later would be looked at as a good pick who became a serviceable starter. He will probably have a similar career to Drummond and no one is calling Andre a bust. If Ayton had been picked around the 7th or 8th slot then there would not be this push to call him a bust. Obviously a much better player was picked after Ayton but ultimately the term bust should be reserved for a high draft pick (top 3) who goes on to have a short career or a statistically unproductive one.

    Marvin Williams - Under performed for his draft position but was a serviceable player for several years so he 's not a real bust

    Hasheem Thabeet- Straight up bust who never cracked the starting line up and had a short career

    Anthony Bennett- Straight up bust

    Wiggins - Under performed for his draft position and the expectations he had prior to entering the league but he has been a serviceable player who was a guy on a championship team but not THE guy on a championship team.

    Ayton is just gonna be like Andre Drummond or Clint Capella, good center who works as a complimentary player to a good team but never THE Guy on a contender.

  • rumblegodB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No lol. He’s a good player. But yes he had higher expectations.

    He’s a guy with physical tools that’s happy to be in the nba and make some cash. He’s not a I want to be the best type player and that’s okay

  • BballopinionB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A 17/10 guy is never going to bust. Sure he’s a disappointment but not a bust.

    Bust is a term reserved for the Anthony Bennetts, Kwame Browns, Markelle Fultz, James Wisemans of the world.