Apart from the two games with a collective daily peak of concurrent players on Steam sitting at 150 poor human souls, where are the FSR3 games?

But scratch FSR3 - where is FSR3.1 that would properly work with VRR screens and therefore could ACTUALLY be beneficial for people who can clearly see non-VRR judder?

  • TodesfaelleBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I made the switch to AMD after about 3 generations of Nvidia and losing DLSS is tough. RT isn’t really my jam but FSR and their frame gen tech still need time to be ironed out.

    While I expected their frame gen to have growing pains I would feel a lot better if they kept regularly updating the baseline FSR image quality too.

    Otherwise quite happy with the raster performance.

  • Tuned_OutBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile I’m chilling here with a 7900xtx, ultrawide 1440p oled, raster native, max settings hitting 120-165fps on everything and it’s just beautiful. Don’t care about ai trash and marketing hype. Brute forcing through native raster the way I always have on an OLED is just beautiful and ray tracing on half a dozen games that I actually care about that have it does good enough. Paid $800 for the 7900xtx vs $1200 for a 4080 at the time.

    Cyber punk was great and it’s the only title I’d say I’d rather experience on a Nvidia alternative. Thankfully I played it twice after release (once immediately and again after it was patched up), and a 3rd time with expansion. It’s a good game but it’s literally the only title I’d love instead on Nvidia. Still, not good enough for me to want to play 50 times and quote benches on to justify a 4090 purchase.