Alright, hear me out. Games that are out of reach with not much time remaining are a boring slog. TV Networks literally cut away from games that are 18 point differences or more. Why not try this method to keep the game engaging

When a player scores a touchdown, they can choose to leave the endzone and begin running towards the opposite endzone. IF they can reach the other endzone without going down, then they are awarded an additional touchdown. At that point they can choose to go back to their original endzone for another touchdown, and so on and so forth. BUT HERE IS THE KICKER, once a player leaves the endzone to begin their journey to the other endzone - getting tackled before reaching the other endzone means forfeiting the touchdown you just scored. If you somehow manage to reach the other endzone and choose to go for a 3rd touchdown, then the same rule applies. Being tackled before reaching the other endzone will result in forfeiture of both touchdowns, and so on and so forth. Theoretically a team could continue scoring touchdowns in perpetuity.

In regards to penalties though, all penalties are reviewable in this situation. Any penalties committed by the defense will result in the offense being allowed to try again from the spot of the foul. Any penalty by the offense will end the attempt.

I know this is stupid, but if one person agrees with me then my friend owes me a plate of wings. What do ya’ll think?