Per title. We knew it was coming some day, tho perhaps not this soon. Will you be upset if you need ugly adapter to make your extensive + expensive watchband collection work?

  • iShootLifeB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I own one band for my series 5, and one for my ultra. I literally couldn’t care less.

  • Money-man2000B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    i think apple switching to magnetic watch bands is highly unlikely. The current system works flawlessly & the bands are secure and solid yet easily removable. Personally don’t feel a redesign is necessary but if the X really is going to bring an all new design like some people think than i wouldn’t be surprised if they switch the way the bands work as the new design may not support current design

    • NomusaMagicOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      100% agree with your assessment! We’ll all see next year!

  • slvrscoobieB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve got a lot of bands. Many through review programs. If the new one had something other than just to ‘wrap you wrist around’ (sensor or something) I’d be happy to start over.

    • NomusaMagicOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ohhhhh … how does one qualify for that hookup? I’m impressed!!

  • jwalk128B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I spent most of my time with the original AW using a 42mm band on a 38mm watch…So I ain’t scared!

    • NomusaMagicOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Look at you! Great financial strategy. Sounds like the new features haven’t been enough to excite you yet!

  • legallypurpleB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would, but hopefully someone will have devised some type of bridge to allow for retroactive fitting of the old bands.

    • NomusaMagicOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You know they’ll hit the secondary market in a hot minute!

    • NomusaMagicOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thx. You’re a lot smarter than some of us!

  • Aion2099B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just hope that we alternative watch wearers (who wear it on the underside of our wrist) can opt for a widescreen orientation.

    • NomusaMagicOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thanks! Now that would be a great option. Nurse here. Lots of us do that with analog watches.

  • mredofcourseB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I won’t be upset, but I don’t think that will happen. I also don’t think there will be an “Apple Watch X” as opposed to an S10 and Ultra 3.

    • NomusaMagicOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Interesting! So you don’t think they’ll capitalize on “anniversary edition”? Something that makes those before it … from across a room … look “vintage”? Like seeing someone w/iP Home Button, Touch Bar Mac or inch wide bezel on iPad? For some, I think The Look outweighs features.

      • mredofcourseB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Wow, you really don’t deserve the downvotes here. I mean, I totally disagree with you, but the questions are worth addressing…

        Apple has really only branded one anniversary product, the Macintosh, which was a flop (for a variety of reasons). I tried to find my previous comment on this, but I doubted there would be an iPhone X and about a year later went back to admit I was wrong, so I could be wrong again, but I was wrong about the branding, not the concept.

        With the iPhone X, I believe, the development of the device came before the branding. The branding was an afterthought and not really accurate. The iPhone X was the 14th released iPhone and was announced 10.5 years after the original iPhone was released and even longer after the original announcement.

        It seems like Apple wanted to transition the iPhone to FaceID and provide a mostly display front side, but knowing this could face resistance decided to release two iPhone lines (the 8, 8 Plus and the X) , with one continuing the old form and one representing where Apple wanted to go. Think X in terms of eXperimental as opposed to 10.

        I really don’t think development followed branding, as the goal of Apple is to develop against the competition year after year. Every incremental improvement translates into billions of dollars as consumers choose iPhone over Android, so they don’t hold things back, nor are they motivated by “it’s the 10-ish anniversary”.

        The Apple Watch already had its eXperimental transition with the Ultra. It looks like people are going to split between the two and both will be maintained moving forward.

        More importantly, the Ultra didn’t obsolete bands.

        Band specs have slightly changed over the years, and I believe they will continue to do so. Apple may at some point find some technical reason to make a major change but it will be due to something like sensors or other functionality and not just to accommodate a different aesthetic design and certainly not to do so because of a 10-ish anniversary.

        To be clear, Apple may call it the Series X and it may coincide with an upgrade that is more significant than what we’ve seen in the past couple of years (that isn’t hard to do), but it won’t be as significant as the Ultra and if they do an “anniversary edition” it’s going to be something like a ceramic version of the S10 or some other jewelry-like premium edition.

        • NomusaMagicOPB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Thank you for the support re: my questions and for thoroughly laying out your case. Very legit reasons presented why next year may NOT be the up/ending change some predict. I guess we’ll all see soon enough. Appreciate you!!

  • AllowmancerB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    My S7 can last another year or two. I’ll feel less bad about exploring other brands if I can’t use the existing bands.

  • pixelated666B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Obviously I will be glad if I won’t be able to use my watch bands

  • JustCallMeSalexB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Even tho I still have about 15 bands I used on my Series watches, I really only use 3 bands for my Ultra and they are all designed for the Ultra.

  • SpiritofhonourB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m sure someone will make some sort of conversion kit to figure out backwards compatibility depending on what the changes are.