Transatlantic collaboration: UK, France, Germany, Canada strengthen international cooperation across offshore wind energy markets

www.carbontrust.com

Transatlantic collaboration: UK, France, Germany, Canada strengthen international cooperation across offshore wind energy markets

www.carbontrust.com

tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org to

United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 month ago

Transatlantic collaboration: Building a global coalition for Atlantic Canada's offshore wind readiness

www.carbontrust.com

Atlantic Canada is preparing for offshore wind development. To support this work, Net Zero Atlantic is collaborating with leading organisations from the United Kingdom, France, and Germany to exchange knowledge and expertise in market development, research, innovation, engagement, and coordination.

The Carbon Trust (United Kingdom), France Energies Marines (France), Stiftung OFFSHORE-WINDENERGIE (Germany), and Net Zero Atlantic (Canada) signed a Memorandum of Understanding during WindEnergy Hamburg 2026.

…

The MoU will support a structured exchange on key issues including regulatory frameworks, maritime spatial planning, grid integration, port infrastructure, environmental considerations, supply chains and stakeholder engagement.

…

Archived

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

United Kingdom@feddit.uk

unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

899 users / day
1.68K users / week
3.41K users / month
7.85K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
7.04K subscribers
6.59K Posts
28.6K Comments
Modlog