• Waterpumpee@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    19 hours ago

    having more kids because hubby made good money is the real story here. Politicians keep mourning low birth rates (albeit some seem too happy to offset them with migration) and keep saying since this is a problem in all industrialized nations must be wealth causing it. Real story is, if wages so low the mother has to work fulltime, they are less likely to get children, if any. Basically we, the workers, get bred out of the DNA pool slowly.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ironically, one of the factors of lowered birthrates in the US is because the working class has veen earning less and less since Reagan due to inflation and the rich fucks continually hoovering up all the increases in wealth for themselves.

      But the billionaires don’t even want high birthrates. Many of them see the rest of us as parasites and want everyone but their personal serfs to die off.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s exactly why politicians are targeting women’s healthcare here in the US - they don’t want to pay more wages, but they also want the birth rate up and women staying at home raising babies. Teen pregnancies have reduced a lot, so they’re taking away sex education and contraception and abortion.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yep I’d at least have one kid if I could afford it. But as it stands 1 kid would make life pay check to pay check and hellish. Me and my wife both even have “decent” jobs. Jobs that 20 years ago would have paid enough for a family of 4 and a suburban house, but today not so much.

      • SippyCup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        13 hours ago

        HVAC guys can bring in that much.

        They work 6, 12 hour days to do it. But they can make pretty good money. They just don’t get to spend it.

        They can also make next to nothing. Depending on unionization status and how busy their area is.

      • Varesti@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It was probably 5 figures when you needed 4 to buy a car and 5 to buy a house.

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Young motherhood nothwithstanding, it must be kind of cool for the oldest/youngest to be able to see that many generations of your family alive at one time. I only vaguely remember some of my (great) grandparents, I can’t imagine seeing seven generations, I bet the extended families are huge.

    • Bubs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      16 hours ago

      From youngest to oldest, the gaps are:

      15 years
      18
      19
      18
      13
      20

      Some of those numbers are not very pleasant…

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The way I like to tell it is that I’ve met someone whose great grandparents were younger than my mom.

    Of course at the time I first met this person they were a newborn. But by now could have kids if the pattern holds.

  • evidences@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I worked with a woman years ago who was a grandma at 34. She had her first kid at 17 and her oldest had one at 17 also.