I LOVE Alfonso Cuarón’s sci-fi action movie Children of Men. I’ve watched maybe six times and every time, the ending always almost brings me to tears. So when I learned it was adapted from P.D. James’ book of the same name, it was a no-brainer deciding what my next book would be.

After finishing the book, it wasn’t difficult to reach to the conclusion that I enjoyed the movie better.

While James’ book gives a more in-depth look at how human infertility and humanity’s slow death march towards extinction affects the sexual dynamic between men and women and almost demented ways humans try to cope with a world without children or a race of dead men walking, I feel the book dedicates WAY too much time describing the failing of human civilization and the Regrets and guilt of Theo Faron. It’s not even until after 2/3 through the book where it feels like the plot and story are properly paced and stuff of consequence actually begin to happen.

The film’s adaptation by, comparison, feels consistent in its pacing and the world building and woe-is-mes of Theo feel more compact a take up less of the audience’s time.

What books do you feel were worse than its film adaptation and why?

  • spanspan3213B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Interesting because I find the first season to be miles better than the others. It’s way more focused and to the point, while I found season 2 especially to be almost unbearable in how repetitive and meandering it was, to the point of being almost irrelevant to the overall narrative.

    Season 3 was better, but it was only in the last couple of episodes where things actually started happening, so it’s really up to season 4 if it wants to keep kicking the can down the road or finally tie up some of these storylines that have been stretched way too thin.