“Genre is a confining madness; it says nothing about how writers write or readers read, and everything about how publishers, retailers and commentators would like them to.”
I can see why some authors might find them annoying (see Vonnegut & SF label), and granted some books are too complicated to categorize comprehensively, but readers need some parameters when browsing.
To this end, I’m always thankful to fellow readers who take the time to comment on novels upon completion.
Edit: This is NOT my suggestion. See article by Alex Clark at:
I wouldn’t. There are a million different ways to describe every book and some of the more general ones help readers to the right area. I think promoting deeper understanding and asking reference librarians for suggestions can deepen/enhance the search.
This post is an automated archive from a submission made on /r/books, powered by Fediverser software running on alien.top. Responses to this submission will not be seen by the original author until they claim ownership of their alien.top account. Please consider reaching out to them let them know about this post and help them migrate to Lemmy.
Lemmy users: you are still very much encouraged to participate in the discussion. There are still many other subscribers on !books@metacritics.zone that can benefit from your contribution and join in the conversation.
Reddit users: you can also join the fediverse right away by getting by visiting https://portal.alien.top. If you are looking for a Reddit alternative made for and by an independent community, check out Fediverser.