People in New York City once again took to the streets to demand a permanent ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza and an end US aid to Israel. Protesters marched from Foley Square to NYC City Hall, Wall Street, and Washington Square Park to raise their demands. The protest took place as the United Nations Security Council was voting on a ceasefire resolution, which was vetoed by the United States.

The protest was called for by the Shut It Down for Palestine Coalition, composed of several organizations including the International Peoples’ Assembly, the Palestinian Youth Movement, the ANSWER Coalition, and National Students for Justice in Palestine, and dozens of other local New York City organizations.

  • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    We can only send thoughts and prayers to the kids dying of school shootings in our country, why do we need to fund a religious war on the other side of the world? I am seriously asking what benefit it is to the US?

    • kozy138@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Every bullet fired, every bomb dropped, is money in the bank for American military corporations. War = $$$

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Both can be true. We can have a just war that prints money for bad people.

          The war in Israel, however, is a bad war printing money for bad people.

          Frankly, I don’t really understand how a privatized military industrial complex is not a blow to national security. You’d think we’d want more cost-effective munitions.

          • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            It was just a comment on the fact that GOP voted down the new care package for Ukraine. If it prints money for them and their buddies they should be for it right? So what could possibly be the reason they vote it down…? coughrussian assetscough

            • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              They’re being pragmatic, they actually want to get paid, and they don’t want the US to have to pay for all of these weapons and other material. Not everyone you disagree with is a Russian asset, no matter how hard that narrative is pushed.

              All of the “aid” the US has sent to Ukraine has been on credit, a 21st Century lend-lease. The original 20th century lend-lease was a roaring success in terms of subjugating the British empire, and it’s also worth noting that a lot of US representatives of that era were very hesitant to approve the “care packages” in the first place as well. The debt Britain owes the US from WWII has actually never been repaid, but the US got global hegemony out of the deal so they agreed to look the other way.

              Ukraine however has no ability to pay off the debt they have already racked up, let alone more. Not just because they’ve lost militarily but also because anything remotely productive in the country (primary farmland and factories) has been parceled off to the highest (US based) bidder, destroyed via the war, or can’t be productive in the foreseeable due to the loss of working people to emigration and war.

    • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It is not a religious war. Was it a religious war when the indigenous peoples elsewhere fought against the invaders? Palestinians are no less passionate about their land than the Lakota or Zulu.

      “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.” — David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.

      • VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The Middle East in general has oil and Israel is our main base over there basically, being an ally in the region. They give us a zone of control. (Also Turkey but Israel is easier to control and it’s good to have backups.)

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Turkey isn’t a reliable ally in the same way Israel is. Turkey is a relatively large country that has the capacity to act fully independently of any great power, and occasionally does. Israel is much smaller and can only sustain itself with US and EU support. A sanctions package like what has been applied to Russia would likely cripple Israel and see it wiped off the map rather quickly, so they have no choice but to stay on side.

    • mkhoury@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was under the impression that there were resources in that area that the US currently has privileged access to because of their alliances there. So they have a stake in making their allies come out on top.

      • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.” — David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        About the Hamas part: AFAIK October 7th was mainly a military attack against legitimate military targets with military goals, with the (very much undeniable, don’t get me wrong) atrocities committed being individual action that hasn’t been proven to come from the top, If I’m not wrong about that understanding I don’t see how Hamas and Israel can be put in the same position here.

        • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          9 months ago

          They still killed a bunch of innocents. You can not deny that, if Hamas actually had a problem with it, then they should surrender everyone who killed innocents.

          Do that, and maybe we can talk.

          10/7 was a terrorist attack against civilians, the blow back has disproportionately affected innocent Palestinians.

          Don’t defend terrorists.

          If a legitimate army had soldiers that did that they would make a VERY public display of what happens to people who attack innocent people at a music festival and release videos of them going house to house in a settlement.

          I have seen the pictures and videos from both sides and they are both indefensible.

          • timidgoat@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m waiting for the IOF to make a very public display of the apache gunners who shot indiscriminately at the festival, or the tank commanders firing indiscriminately at homes in the kibbutzim. Your argument falls flat when the Israeli army not only is killing thousands of civilians in Gaza (and are proud of it btw), but also their own citizens on Oct 7.

            • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t doubt that, I clearly stated fuck them both.

              I have seen the videos from Hamas going building to building and shooting out tires and trying to scare people out with them.

              Everyone has seen the Israeli videos, even their best ones don’t make them look good

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You can not deny that, if Hamas actually had a problem with it, then they should surrender everyone who killed innocents.

            Yeah they probably don’t have a problem with it, that’s true enough and can’t be defended. But they didn’t go “we should go there and kill civilians”, is what I mean. Some people have that impression about the attack and that’s playing right into Israel’s hands. Unfortunately punishing soldiers who commit warcrimes is a standard neither side is trying to reach.

            Also, from what we know the music festival wasn’t a one-sided Hamas massacre; there was combat with the IDF and many of the people who died died in the crossfire. Not saying there weren’t people who killed innocents (particularly the guy who threw that one grenade should be hanged), but the image that Hamas went in guns blazing and killed a bunch of people is at this point in time plain Israeli propaganda that spread before the details were known.

        • gila@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Right, we have to just murder those kids so they can’t be used as bombs. It’s like you’re seeing the matrix dude, amazing stuff

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Both sides are shitty. One side is being significantly more shitty without restraint. If you look at numbers, one side is doing considerably more harm than the other. If you look at individual acts of shittiness, then sure, under that squinted framing, both sides are equal.

    • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.” — David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.