Well I’m sorry that you got shitty responses like that. Which platform(s) was this on?
Well I’m sorry that you got shitty responses like that. Which platform(s) was this on?
You’ll see when you start your second project why this doesn’t work.
Can you be more specific? I’ve had nothing but great experiences from the rust community.
The US providing this defense however allows Israel to be even more belligerent without fear of retaliation, possibly the only thing stopping them from expanding their genocide faster.
If it’s anything like ChromeOS, it’ll be a VM where you can do whatever you want, within that VM.
Your default types for that are i32 or u32. It’s the exact same number of characters yet encodes more precise information.
I’m aware of packing, but for my specific niche the main bottleneck is CPU, and it’s important to minimize the amount of memory usage to improve data locality, increasing cache hit rates, ultimately increasing cpu throughout. Any gains we would make by packing such small values would likely be eliminated by the cost of unpacking them, unless it’s a flags-like value where we are primarily comparing individual bits.
I’ll be honest if that’s your complaint, I have a hard time believing you would find the equivalent C or C++ code to be better.
Cargo being an all-in-one tool is actually one of my favorite things about the rust ecosystem. It’s many things, and it does it all seamlessly.
Regarding comparing to C or C++, how can you argue either is designed better? C, while standing the test of time, predates so many modern programming concepts or standards and writing C code is extremely error prone. C++ improves on many of C’s shortfalls, but it wasn’t designed. It’s the result of different things being loosely bolted on to C over the course of 30 years. And it’s still error prone, for example while there are smart pointers and other types that can make writing memory safe code possible, they’re not default and they aren’t always fully supported in the standard library, let alone anything else.
I do systems programming work, sometimes with constrained memory scenarios. We always want to use the smallest types we can for any task, and unless negative numbers are a necessary, always prefer unsigned. That means a lot of u8 and u16 unless we know a value is likely to need more bits to be represented. Probably doesn’t matter as much in we programming but that’s not Rust’s niche (or well not its original niche).
It does define minimum sizes for different types. An int for example is at least two bytes, whatever size those might be!
Why this over a much more popular modern language like Rust?
If a custom rom can’t support it, that’s more about the custom rom than Samsung here. They will almost certainly open source the kernel driver part, and any user library could be copied from the stock rom if absolutely necessary. If a rom developer doesn’t want to do that, well that can’t be reasonably pinned on Samsung.
In the branding, but the name of the installed applications in the UI do not contain “gnome”.
Is gnome that bad? They seem to have been moving away from weird names for many years now.
Oh they’re doing something about it, they’re funding, supplying and defending the genocide on the world stage.
You don’t, and because of that the UN is losing its relevance. It was never perfect, but it’s increasingly sidelined by major powers that will just do whatever they want. The Palestinian genocide shows us that it is unable to stop a genocide, the war in Ukraine and previously the war in Iraq show that it can’t stop powers from just invading whomever. Even as a forum it is losing relevance, with smaller groups like the G7 and BRICS, or regional blocs like the EU and ASEAN becoming the source of new international policy.
Unless you live in the EU or California, odds are that just deletes the public data, I’m sure Reddit retains it and would sell it.
Turns out you can’t end terrorism by sending in more terrorists.
This seems like the perfect advertising pitch for Comac. “Buy our planes, they stay in the air, we screw the doors in all the way, and we won’t come steal them from you”
Not necessarily. If you trust the code running on your device then there is no backdoor they could install on a server that would break e2ee. They would have to backdoor the client where the keys are.