• stormesp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    God lord, can we get a bit of filtering on the bullshit of articles that get posted on this community? I apreciate anyone that spends their time filling this sub with content, but the quality of the content shared is just terrible

    • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Then downvote and move on. No need to make people that actually post content feel unwelcome and unappreciated. That just leads to no content and thus no reason to even use Lemmy / the Fediverse.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Considering the massive push across multiple lemmy instances to completely remove downvotes, leaving a comment is actually becoming the only way to state you dont like or want specific content on a sub.

        The fediverse actively disagrees with you on how to filter content quality.

      • stormesp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you bothered to read my comment, i said that before anything else, i apreciate the effort of generating content. But at the end of the day its not of much use for anyone flooding a community with shitty content.

    • William@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      IMO, the problem is that there’s not a log of good content being produced. The vast majority of it is vapid clickbait garbage. Some people eat that up, and they also share it. I don’t think there’s a way to stem the tide. Ever.

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I don’t believe Sean Murray and I will not be buying this game at launch or even for several years.

    I still don’t own No Mans Sky and it’s specifically because I’m pissed off that people think it’s some kind of great redemption story. It’s not.

    It’s a hellish nightmare indicative of the current state of the gaming industry.

    Small studios have to manufacture impossible hype in the hope their game sells, then they go about fixing it, even though they promised features at launch and all they are really doing is just giving you the product you already paid for.

    What other product would people ever be happy with this arrangement?

    • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Still unoptimized… i slogged 90hrs over multiple updates and years hoping that a quality of life patch would come. just got more skins and ships and aliens…cool.

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fr I went back and played a little bit of it after dropping it like a week after launch.

      Still bugged asf

      Dogfights still deteriorate to drones flying past you at mach 1 and landing one shot while you slowly try and keep them in frame, only for them to blow past you again.

      I ended up in some town that was attacked by sentinels, fuckers were constantly healing each other through the wall.

        • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          While obviously subjective, this comment is hilarious to me because after trying to get into Starfield for a dozen hours or so I just couldn’t enjoy it and started up a new NMS file.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have yet to see anyone say starfield does better than no mans sky.

          Most people started playing no mans sky because of starfield, usually.

          Youre the first Ive seen who would suggest the opposite

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I prefer the combat of Starfield, no mans sky is worthless gor that itch for me. But the difference comes down to prefering a space themed bethesda game over a space themed survival crafting game.

  • CarlsIII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Has he even said anything yet about this game that sounds unbelievable? I feel like people are getting preemptively angry.

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      People are also forgetting that he spent the past decade creating systems and tech for NMS that he can now use in his new game. Systems and Tech he didn’t have in hand when dreaming up NMS.

      • CarlsIII@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        As far as I know all they’ve really said so far is “this is going to be a huge and epic game!” And people already seem to be like “oh boy another lie”

    • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “The first real open world.”

      That’s a rather hyperbolic statement, even if they’re not just over-hyping.

  • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Everything they showed in the trailer is already in NMS, but now it has fantasy skin. I’m willing to believe him this time.

    (but still don’t preorder)

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    i love all the game outlets pissing themselves over whether they should be pissing themselves over this game

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.


    If he plans on pulling a No Man’s Sky 2.0 by overhyping and then fixing in post, I can only hope he finds a gaming community far less receptive to his bullshit this time around.

  • AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What a weird time in gaming, Bethesda trying to copy No Man’s Sky with Starfield and Hello Games trying to copy what Bethesda is trying to sell what The Elder Scrolls 6 is supposed to be. Considering what Hello World has already proven themselves capable off, they are definitely going to be throwing some punches.

  • Veraxus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure not preordering and I will wait until plenty of detailed reviews and gameplay videos are out before I buy. As solid as NMS is right now, it was a steaming pile on release. I won’t risk it again.

    • CarlsIII@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      “This game MIGHT end up being controversial. We’re just going to act like it already is.”