• Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    OP is a sci-fi writer himself, so he’s in a good position to comment. The TLDR of this piece is that most sci-fi is produced by commercial writers trying to earn a living by producing relatively formulaic work that follows genre conventions. The problem is some of today’s tech-billionaires are acting as if these books are bibles of future prediction.

    Oddly, people seem less influenced by the positive, utopian sci-fi visions. ‘Star Trek’ depicted a humanity that moved beyond money, and where society was devoted to exploration and the advancement of knowledge. You rarely see billionaires go on about making the world like it. Perhaps unsurprisingly, as there were no billionaires (or any need for them) in ‘Star Trek’.

    • Skunk@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s why as a (really small and unknown) sci-fi writer I want everyone to write utopia and beautiful futures instead of dark dystopia where life is a nightmare.

      Because if sci-fi has any influence, make it a good one, solar punk Star Trek style or whatever. What is the point of fighting for the future if you strongly believe it will be worse than today.

        • Skunk@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          In theory yes, much like History.

          But then one day you have people thinking “The Handmaid’s Tale” is a user manual.

            • Skunk@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              No, not yet ? I don’t think so but I stopped reading bad news to live in my own lemmy wholesome bubble made of food, sci-fi and cats.

              • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Ah, okay. Shits crazy out here, but there’s nobody in the West suggesting fertility slaves or abolishing female literacy.

    • Endward23@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      ‘Star Trek’ depicted a humanity that moved beyond money, and where society was devoted to exploration and the advancement of knowledge.

      And this is, tbh, considered really unrealistic, even by the mayority of the fanbase itself.