Personally I wish she’d go away. I can’t think of anything she’s accomplished.

  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    She’s an idiot.

    She always wrong on the issues.

    Where do you get she made Amazon pay? Amazon didn’t select her location. They went elsewhere because of her. That’s the one thing I agree with her on.

    • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Amazon did not go elsewhere because of her. They backed out initially because of her, because they thought that it would get them a better deal. It did not. They came back to the same place and paid for their own infrastructure because they needed the talent in that location. She did not allow them to pull a Foxconn on her constituents.

      And as I said, only idiots call her an idiot. I am sorry you have accomplished nothing.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        No they built HQ2 in Virginia. Do you have a cite they built it in her district? That’d be news to me.

        • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You are correct about HQ2 being in Arlington. A while back I am pretty sure that I read about how they had returned to considering Queens again but without public funding of their operations.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            In all fairness it’s one of the few things she was right about. You can’t kiss up to company like Amazon. They are leeches.

    • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What issues is she wrong on? Do they involve making rich people richer for nothing in return? Do they involve giving more government power to corporations or privatizing government responsibilities?

        • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Again, not an answer. You’re going.to have to define “dumb”. Actually trying to find solutions to problems is smart (AOC); rejecting all attempts at this is dumb (Boebert).

          No conservative policy had led to prosperity. Why do you keep hanging on to them?

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Trickle down has been very effective. At least for me it has and it’s why democrats have kept it in place.

            Regan actually had a degree in economics.

            So does aoc.

            Define dumb. Easy aoc. It’s synonymous. That means it’s the same thing. I could easily say stop being a aoc ass

            • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Welp, looks like you failed this test. Trickle down has absolutely NOT been successful. It did the exact opposite of it’s claims. It has been wildly rejected everywhere and has been a direct cause of poverty and homelessness.

              Also, cant help but notice that conservative-run cities and states are wildly impoverished and fall last in every metric. They even have the worst crime rates.

              But your feelings are more important than facts, so reason will be wasted here.