I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren’t worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

  • HDMI, yes. Not so much for USB cables.

    USB cables are (commonly) subject to more stress; they’re often moved, plugged, unplugged, and can often have lifespans far longer than the devices they’re using to connect. There are other, non-spec-related factors that impact durability, such as nylon wrapping, more robust connectors, and so on. Durability isn’t as much a factor for HDMI, ethernet, or optical cables, but for USB, sometimes durability is worth extra money, if only to reduce e-waste.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But you’re still not going to get appreciably different performance or longevity from a $50 USB-C cable than from a $10 USB-C cable.

      And I recognize that it’s not exactly the same thing, but as a decent rule of thumb, if the company is willing to actually build the thing in spec, they’re probably doing a good enough job that it’s going to last a reasonable amount of time, so the spec is still useful for that purpose. To wit: I’ve never had an in-spec USB-C cable or connector fail.

      • I have, but your probably right in the general.

        Most recently, I had a plug housing (aluminium) seperate from the guts when I tugged on it. It’s not like it happens frequently; Apple lightning cables are far more fragile, but that’s probably by design.