A lawsuit launched by far-right fanatic and mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik accusing the state of abusing his human rights has opened in Norway.
Breivik, who killed 77 people in a bombing and shooting rampage in 2011, appeared in a court set up in the high-security jail in which he is serving his sentence on Monday. By accusing Norway’s Ministry of Justice of breaching his human rights, he hopes to force the authorities to end his years in isolation.
The 44-year-old killer’s lawyer laid out an argument that the conditions of his detention violated his human rights.
“He has been isolated for about 12 years,” Oeystein Storrvik told the hearing. “He is only in contact with professionals, not with other inmates.”
In earlier court filings, Storrvik had argued the isolation had left Breivik suicidal and dependent on the anti-depression medication Prozac.
Breivik claims the isolation he has faced since he started serving his prison sentence in 2012 amounts to inhumane punishment under the European Convention on Human Rights. He failed in a similar attempt in 2016 -17, when his appeal was denied by the European Court of Justice.
The extremist, who distributed copies of a manifesto before his attack, is suing the state and also asking the court to lift restrictions on his correspondence with the outside world.
He killed eight people with a car bomb in Oslo then gunned down 69 others, most of them teenagers, at a Labour Party youth camp. It was Norway’s worst peacetime atrocity.
Breivik spends his time in a dedicated section of Ringerike prison, the third prison in which he has been held. His separated section includes a training room, a kitchen, a TV room and a bathroom, pictures from a visit last month by news agency NTB showed.
He is allowed to keep three budgerigars as pets and let them fly freely in the area, NTB reported.
He doesnt play well with others. The last he was allowed out, he killed 77 people after shooting and bombing them. He is basically been put on the naughty step and is wailing about it, and as far as naughty steps comparably go, he is living in luxury.
If not kept in isolation, he will radicalise others because he is entirely unrepentant for what he has done and sees no wrong in it. If we see what he did as wrong then how can we justify killing, no matter how sterile and regulated we make the conditions?
There must be some way to allow him around other people without allowing him to spread his ideology. For instance, maybe don’t let him be around white people. He doesn’t like isolation? Okay, here you go buddy!
You can’t justify endless isolation either. Between two unjustified and inhumane options, at least death is final. He might be isolated for several more decades.