• jak@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This seems consistent with what I learned in CCD and Catholic school in the 90s-00s. We were always told that sexual pleasure was increased in a marriage and a sign of god blessing the marriage, whereas sexual pleasure outside of a marriage was cheap and damaging.

    Edit: side note, I didn’t think this fucked me up until I got married and realized I’d felt ashamed every other time I’d had sex. I never believed in god, and this is pretty obviously trying to steer behavior, so I thought I was unaffected, but it’s still a brain virus

  • Zehzin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t know why the headline made me Imagine the Pope getting really excited and calling all his homies in cause he found out what sex is

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Me learning about masturbation for the first time: 😳

    The priest showing me: 🤫

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That would be doctrinal breaktrough, but the long strings of popes saying whatever they find convenient at the moment tuned the formal requirements for pope to be infallible pretty high. And i won’t even mention that whatever cool thing Francis ever said as a pope have exactly zero influence on church reality.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That would be doctrinal breaktrough

      No it wouldn’t. This is a standard way of talking about marriage in oppressive religions, including Catholicism

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        So by “relationships” he just meant “marriage” as church always did? It’s clear from the context he is not, since lower there is mentions of “same-sex relationships”, not to mention even the word itself suggest any something wider.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think he’s intentionally vague when using the word relationships. The word does not explicitly mean any one thing. But yeah sex within marriage has always been praised in Christianity. It’s been a big selling point of marriage in general. I don’t see anything in the article to suggest he’s explicitly blessed homosexual sex or truly changed any doctrine.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, if that was taken on a face value then the acceptance of all kinds of extramarital relationships would be a big doctrinal change, but nothing is happening, as i noted in my first post.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      I guess we’re all God’s pets children and He wants us to keep reproducing. Evolution is compatible with believing in God. Now why He put my g spot inaide my ass can only be proof of His immense sense of humour.

  • lionkoy5555@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    IIRC Song of songs is all about s3x or the pleasure of it. I struggled when i first read it back when i was still one of them.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández, who was appointed last July, came under fire for a book he wrote and published in the late 1990s entitled Mystical Passion: Spirituality and Sensuality.

    The Pope had already tackled the vice of gluttony last week and there was no suggestion that his sermon on lust during Wednesday’s general audience was related to criticism of the cardinal.

    In December, Cardinal Fernández introduced a text, later approved by Pope Francis, detailing guidelines allowing priests to bless same-sex couples relationships that were still considered sinful.

    In a lengthy response posted online, Cardinal Müller said that a priest blessing a homosexual union would be committing a “sacrilegious and blasphemous act”.

    Prelates around the world also released statements condemning the decision, including American conservatives, who have long been vocal in opposing the Pope’s plans for reforming the Catholic Church.

    Tensions reached a nadir when the Pope evicted outspoken critic US Cardinal Raymond Burke from his Vatican apartment and revoked his salary.


    The original article contains 437 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Pretty sure sexual pleasure is the result of friction, nerve endings, a bunch of neuro-chemicals, and a whole lot of fetishes. If anyone is letting us enjoy sexual pleasure, it’s the other department.

    • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bro out of all the people of the churches in the world, I really think pope Francis is the last person to bring this point on…

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, a real leader among leaders.

        The Catholic Church has protected pedophiles among their ranks for as long as the Catholic Church has been around.

        They’ve thrown a few under the bus after overwhelming evidence has been filed against them, but that doesn’t change much.

        • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The Catholic Church has protected pedophiles among their ranks for as long as the Catholic Church has been around.

          It is documented and undeniable that there have been such figures in the church, but it is my opinion that this specific pope has been trying to bring the church in a different direction, both on this specific issue, but also generally more progressive, if you want.

          Yeah, a real leader among leaders.

          Thanks for sharing this article, I’ve read it and tried to do more reaserch on the topic (turns out the wikipedia page on the matter is pretty dense and source-full, while the NYT wrote just has a couple lines written quickly). I will answer with this article from the guardian

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            “Despite recent measures to root out abuse by priests and increase transparency, some victims say the Vatican still has not gone far enough to protect children even in the West, where intense media coverage of paedophile priests has led to greater scrutiny of church practices.”

            Francis has been in power for over a decade now, and that quote (from your link) was written years ago. Nothing has really changed.