• Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is racism and/or misogyny to firmly believe safety issues arise because of diversity, as if the policy is the sole reason any safety issues could come about. The flow of logic is the opposite of what you’re saying. It basically asserts that the only reason safety issues occurs is because of the demographic makeup of the crew.

    Not at all. Since they are focusing on DEI more than safety, it is neither racist or misogynistic.

    Since their ratings are dropping, it appears there is some credence to it.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You have a pool of candidates if they are ranked based on qualifications the order is not guaranteed to be the same as if you prioritize diversity. If you want the most qualified candidates the only way you can guarantee it if you only focus on qualifications.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        As the second article i posted points out. There is just enough diversity in pilots that you can set a goal of 50%. That means to hit that goal, you have swap quality to get there.