After laying off almost 2,000 people, Xbox finds itself in a position at odds with the community-first image it has cultivated for itself.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It should be no surprise. Xbox, and Microsoft as a whole, are businesses whose only goal is profit at any cost. It’s capitalism at any stage. And as long as there are people willing to spend money on their services (myself included), they will continue doing what they do.

    • NeryK@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Still, it bears reiterating lest some start believing in the marketing they spin. No company or division of a company can be a friend to anyone. Even PC darling Valve isn’t ! (and I say that having spent thousands of euros on Valve’s products and services)

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        And even bearing that in mind, Microsoft has time and again openly shown anti consumer behavior, so they shouldn’t be awarded even the slightest amount of trust. Allowing them to continue existing in their current form is already too much.

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve never encountered the ridiculous idea that Xbox was “community-first.” 100% of everybody has always known that Xbox and Microsoft are rapacious and exploitative hawkers. Nothing has been shattered here, except the financial stability of thousands of tech workers. Which is a normal part of the alienation of capitalist society.

  • bobbytables@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    “made redundant” is such a terrible euphemism. They were fired. Say it like it is.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well there is a distinction between the two though right? When you get fired, that’s it. You just stop working there. Being made redundant you also get given X amount of extra pay depending on their policies and the laws of where they are to make up for the time that they may be unemployed between jobs.

      • bobbytables@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thanks for the insight! I look at it from a European/German perspective and here that distinction doesn’t really exist or doesn’t really make a difference. TIL!

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s also worth noting when companies combine there are many positions that are redundant as things are shuffled around, that is literally different then just laying off people because of company performance or w/e

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’d go even further: “They were fired so rich executives and shareholders could become more rich.”

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s a crock of shit platitude too if you look at the statements from workers that are affected

    • Lath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      It also shows they have no idea what they’re doing. Redundancies are good for tech.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    the tone around the (Microsoft-Actiblizzard) merger was largely dominated by vocally supportive Xbox players and commentators

    Excuse me, what? I guess my social bubble is thick as fuck, because I didn’t see a single person supporting that megacorp scale merger.

    These two concurrent pushes (of marketing good vibes image) resulted in a landscape that was, at best, reluctant to discuss the potential harm of its acquisitions and, at worst, actively rejected it because Xbox’s “good guy” image and messaging had so thoroughly seeped into the foundations of shared community spaces and broader gaming consciousness

    Feels like a load of bullshit, then again I don’t even know where the cool kids hang out, so it could be me.

    The superficial artifice of Xbox’s brand permeates every corner of video game marketing. It’s an endless parade of phrases that don’t quite mean anything and campaigns designed to romanticise and humanise the company’s seemingly bottomless appetite for growth at all costs.

    I guess this is why I didn’t buy into the previous paragraphs, I just assumed people were “too smart” to fall for so much corporate bullshit.

    Microsoft closed the day with a $3 trillion valuation for the first time in the company’s history.

    3 trillion with roughly 20k employees now. I wonder how much of that value is assigned to its workforce, like “of the 3 trillion our company’s worth, our workers are worth 100 billion” or something.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The support I saw around the merger was from blizzard fans who were excited that maybe Microsoft would mismanage blizzard slightly less than Activision did

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Basically this.

        I don’t like mergers but holy fuck Activision/Blizzard had to go. That that POS Kotick got away with a golden parachute while pulling every dirty trick that unluckier cronies have pulled once and gotten cancelled, is a travesty.

        Getting acquired is just about the only way something that big “dies”. Activision swore many times they’d change, but it was never gonna happen. Too many wore rose tinted glasses and forgave them because of what Blizzard once was, dismissing what it had become.

        Microsoft has been good to its subsidiary studios in recent years, but eventually it too will have to be dealt with in some form. My preferred method would be hitting it with the “monopoly-break-up-stick” again.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Exactly, it’s not so much cheering for how great it will be, moreso that it can’t really get any worse, and while xbox and Microsoft aren’t great, Actiblizzard completely destroyed themselves from a public perception.

    • Matt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There was definitely a lot of support for this merger - people see it as ABK’s “redemption arc”, and there was a lot of excitement around ABK games coming to GamePass / other platforms like Steam because of this.

      Ultimately this is how people think: What is in the merger for them? And they don’t think macro, but just simple things like “now I can finally get this game on [platform]”