• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’re functionally the same as normal SIM, instead it is stored in a secure location of the storage (which can survive factory reset). In a way, it makes it a bit more secure as a thief can’t just yank out the SIM card to avoid being tracked (although it doesn’t defeat a faraday bag) or take it out to use it in another phone.

    • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The major function of a normal SIM is the ability to take it out of one device and put it into another one, effectively disconnecting my identity towards the network provider, from the handset. With eSIM, that doesn’t exist, and if my phone breaks, it’s unclear what happens.

      To me, that’s not secure, that’s unsafe and insecure.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        From a corporate device perspective it’s an interesting evolution though, since we can remotely provision an eSIM through our mobile device management platform. No SIM to handle from the user point of view, and they can’t take it out.