WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 9 months agoAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down127
arrow-up1353arrow-down1imageAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksWolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 9 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up43arrow-down4·edit-29 months agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up26·9 months agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-squareDaefsdeda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·9 months agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.