i wouldn’t normally be concerned since any company releasing a VR product with this price tag is obviously going to fail… but it’s apple and somehow through exquisite branding and sleek design they have managed to create something that resonated with “tech reviewers” and rich folk who can afford it.

what’s really concerning is that it’s not marketed as a new VR headset, it’s marketed by apple and these “tech reviewers” as the new iphone, something you take with you everywhere and do your daily tasks in, consume content in etc…

and it’s dystopian. imagine you are watching youtube on this thing and when an ad shows up, you can’t look away, even if you try to they can track your eye movement and just move the window, you can’t mute it, you certainly cannot install adblock on it, you are forced to watch the ad until it satisfies apple or you just give up and take out the headset.

this is why i think all these tech giants (google meta apple etc) were/are interested in the “metaverse”. it holds both your vision and your hearing hostage, you cannot do anything else when using it but to just use the thing. a 100% efficiency attention machine, completely blocking you from the outside world.

i’m not concerned about this iteration as much as people are not hyped about this iteration. just like how people are hyped about the next apple vision, i’m more worried about the next iterations with somewhat lower price tag and better software availability. i hope it flops and i know it probably won’t achieve any sort of mainstream adoption even if it’s deemed a success because it probably can’t get less bulky and look less dorky, but the possibility is still worrying. what are your thoughts?

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Is this a copy/paste from when Google Glasses launched and then completely disappeared within months? I feel like I’ve seen this panic before.

    Your problem is with capitalism and an Apple VR doesn’t change that.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Google glass never actually “launched” in any meaningful sense of the word, and was a rough-as-fuck user experience.

      Ironically what did it in was the ability to record video. People were so panicked about being filmed that they started reacting violently to glass users (called glassholes). From that point on it sort of became a laughing stock. Not cool. A tainted product.

      Apple seems to have mitigated the obvious pitfalls, let’s see how it shakes out.

      • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s funny that you don’t know what you don’t know. Google glass definitely launched, and is used by certain businesses. They went B2B instead of B2C and apparently did well enough.

      • thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        In terms of privacy in public, the Vision Pro isn’t much different from Google Glass. Both have video recording capabilities, and both displayed some form of indication when recording.

        The only real difference is that the Vision Pro is easier to spot in public due to the bulkier design.

        It will be interesting to see if there will be similar “Glasshole” reaction to the Vision Pro once they are seen in public enough.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not like vision peo aint also recording everything :p
        And if not for the environment travking then for their passthrough and tracking.

        And probably a shitload of telemetry.