• Steve@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can they just focus on the browser? I really don’t need the AI stuff.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The issue is that Firefox alone doesn’t pay the bills and I’d imagine they really want to get away from being dependent on the Google deal they have.

      We don’t need AI stuff but if they can get some good funding from it, they can put more into the browser

          • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            And maybe merge the two, like adding a tldr feature to reader mode, instead of an obnoxious sidebar like a lot of browsers right now

          • 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Mozilla seized an opportunity to bring trustworthy AI into Firefox

            Therefore, as part of the changes today, we will be bringing together Pocket, Content, and the AI/ML teams supporting content with the Firefox Organization

            This is from the Mozilla release. The second quote does say “Firefox Organization” and not “Firefox”, but it seems clear they are planning on integrating AI into Firefox.

            But, I’ve reread @NotSteve_'s comment and they were saying the funding earned from AI could be put into Firefox, not AI itself. NotSteve wasn’t claiming that putting AI into Firefox would bring in more funding, only that AI could be a separate source of revenue. So my question is moot.

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Mozilla downsizes as it refocuses on Firefox and AI drops multiple products and layoff 60 so that its current budget can accomodate the stratospheric compensation of its new CEO.

    • LemmyHead@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Actually I think AI in browser could potentially become a much more effective content blocker than ad blockers like ublock in the future.

      • Madis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I recall there being at least one content blocker that worked by heuristics instead of rulesets. Cannot remember the name, but it was clearly not as effective as conventional ones, because not all ads look the same and usually people want to block the invisible trackers as well.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I dunno, having a free, open model made by a trusted company would be nice. I like initiatives like Mozilla Voice, this could be something similar. Probably not great if it’s replacing focus on the other things though.

    • Hadouken Shoryuken@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      100% agreed. I just hope whatever this AI they are thinking isnt about what info I should consume. What the AI think is good doesnt mean its the only info I should consume.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Sigh, and here I was, thinking Microsoft trying to shove its useless (to me) AI down my throat at every opportunity was annoying… Quo vadis Mozilla, what are you guys doing… :(

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ai is coming either way. It’s not really avoidable, and if Mozilla were to divest from that area too they would set themselves up for failure. A few years down the road all browsers will have some sort of ai integration, perhaps large parts of the web too. If Mozilla doesn’t keep up it will just become entirely irrelevant and the internet will be fully controlled by google and its chromium bs.

      Besides, what they did so far is really neat and how I would like to see ai integrated: offline translation features on your local device, not somewhere under control of some corporation. More of that please

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      She spent 2 yrs at McK 20+ yrs ago - hardly a personality-defining milestone, given how a lot of business students start their career in consulting.

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I mean that’s pretty standard for a McKinsey ghoul:

        • Step 1: go to an ivy league college, get a business degree
        • Step 2: work for McKinsey for a few years as an associate
        • Step 3: get a job at a McKinsey client leapfrogging everyone else into management/c-suite
        • Step 4: hire McKinsey to bring their arrogant children into your org and screw things up

        Everything about her subsequent career has been going from one upper management/c-suite role in a tech company to another. This is not the resume of a person who should be running a nonprofit that controls the most important open source project on the internet. But beyond that just look at what she’s done in her one month at Mozilla:

          1. Massive round of layoffs
          1. “Focus on {buzzword}” where {buzzword} in this case is AI

        That’s straight out of the McKinsey playbook.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          For once I see legitimate criticism about Mozilla without the Lunduke part. And the worst part is that just like Emily, Laura will be protected from all scrutiny just because she is a woman. It will not matter that she is a capitalist from McKinsey, or that she will eat away at developers’ salaries and walk away happily with no consequences. Maybe we will see again, just like Emily, beach photos with arrogance and insults?

          Terrible times for Mozilla. AI obsession is just extra damage.

          • SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Laura will be protected from all scrutiny just because she is a woman

            Lol what, no. It’s because she’s for all intents and purposes the CEO, and better yet, an overly paid CEO. When’s the last time you’ve seen the CEO getting their comeuppance?

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              The figurehead is chosen selectively, most likely for political purposes, since Mozilla wants to relate to California rather than Florida. Emily was not competent at all, and Laura somehow comes from McKinsey to handle a non-profit giant. There are plenty people worthy of running Mozilla that are not capitalist leeches.

      • SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You rarely stay very long in those companies nowadays. Unless you aim at becoming CEO in 20 years’ time. But otherwise, you just get your golden parachute after a couple of years of doing horrible shit.

  • FlumPHP@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    While we resourced mozilla.social heavily to pursue this ambitious idea,

    How many people do you need to administer a Mastodon instance? I’m pretty sure infosec.exchange is like one dude.

  • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber

    IMO these were their best products. 🙁

    Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

    Ugh, god damn it.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would assume they’re taking a hard look at revenue figures. I currently do use their VPN, but my impression is that it isn’t much more than a repackaging of Mullvad VPN. No idea about the other products. Is their Relay and Scrubber offering more outstanding?

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Let’s skip the AI and give thunderbird some love instead. Then again, it’s pretty feature complete as is. Just keep it up to date to keep running and secure.