So having read a lot of the threads on scrim results, interviews etc. Why is it all being categorized as an excuse? Sure the scrim results have some element of “Hey we aren’t that bad” by posting the specifics but so what.
A player saying “We should’ve banned jax” is not an excuse, they aren’t saying “If we did X we’d definitely win” as they still could’ve lost. It’s just reflecting on what you did and criticizing it.
Can anyone show what excuses they are making? The only one I can see and actually agree with is western teams are providing shit practice for them. If over a year you’re only losing like 4 scrim blocks there’s a problem. Without specifics you can’t even tell if they’re using scrims properly so it’s a null point.
You must log in or register to comment.
G2 staff and players are not making excuses. They just wont stop talking back to anyone who criticizes them, which is not making anything better.
The ones I’m surprised about are all the personalities and fans acting like G2 had just one bad day. They talk like G2 were equal or even favourites against some eastern teams. In the whole tournament, they won 2 bo1 vs 4th seed if east. They have lost every series they played. How is this good enough to claim they are a “good” team ? They are better than other west but they did not beat a single eastern team convincingly (remember the 2 bo1s were messy as well).
I feel like Mikyx talks such a big game whenever G2 strings some wins and then when they’re losing “Oh guys we aren’t playing like ourselves I dunno dude.”