The idea that we are entering an era of techno-feudalism that will be worse than capitalism is chilling and controversial. We asked former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis to elucidate this idea, explain how we got here, and map out some alternatives.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Social democracy is a system that is completely different from democratic socialism. SocDems are capitalists, DemSocs are absolutely not.

    • Poggervania@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also the Netherlands is still very much capitalistic while having much more protections for their citizens.

      This isn’t a blanket “capitalism bad”, it’s the fact we allowed our country to be bought out by capitalism.

        • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Anyone who self-identifies as a Republican at this point in time is either delusional or psychotic. Full stop.

        • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m a progressive and think conservatism is a totally valid political viewpoint - to continue doing what worked. And that is the social systems that worked so well for many decades. Unfortunately the GOP has become more and more reactionary for decades now (“paleo conservative”). So social democrats should be seen as conservatives really. And capitalists have accumulated so much money and power that it isn’t working any more.

          The problem isn’t capitalism but human nature. We see it in every type of government or economic system. People get greedy and jack crap up.

          I’d say the problem is that we don’t account for human nature in systems. We’ve elevated infinite greed as a totally valid and natural viewpoint, when it’s just not. In an environment with the right rules and basic fairness and decency you can absolutely tell most people to do something not for their own benefit because it’s for the public good, for your country, for your patients, and most people will be quite happy doing that.

          That gives cover to the few percent of people who are eternally greedy, see nothing but materialism, the “sociopaths” and narcissists and narrow minded ideologues. That really requires a kind of reconstruction.

          We need to specifically start thinking and talking about politics and business as systems that must be safeguarded against excess, and actively prevent people who care about nothing but money or power from advancing.

          And specifically because of climate change we need to start thinking about a plan. Because it’s an emergency similar to a war “all or nothing” economy we need to create a “limited planned economy” for certain sectors and allow for eminent domain to transfer sectors into public hands - at least for sectors that you can’t reasonably assume they can be induced with market regulations and things like carbon taxes. Because capitalists will always game the system and maximize profit. That has to be understood and CEOs put in charge that understand that besides profit, they are not to oppose regulations or rules of the game set by society.

          I’d be very curious if you think conservatives in the GOP could be convinced by any of this?