• HauntedBucket@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Beats WebEx. I contracted at Cisco after they had bought WebEx and the dev teams had to stagger their scrums in the morning because WebEx infra couldn’t support all the meetings at once.

  • Spoilt@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    We have Skype + Mattermost (without gifs) + Rainbow. Give me Teams if you want, but please, stop adding tools.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I tried to get our team to move to Matrix when COVID hit and there was no infrastructure for remote work.

    It was such a shame that it was that exact time Jitsi had issues with Firefox (which most of us use), so we couldn’t videochat.

    If Jitsi had that resolved immediately, we perhaps could have used something open for at least couple of years. Maybe others would follow suit.

    Oh well. Teams it is.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      thats probably my biggest issue with open alternatives.

      they always fail to take advantage of those opportunities and things stay broken until its way too late.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But I also harp a lot to my superiors about donating to open-source projects we utilize, make loads of money thanks to them, yet never give anything back.

        I kinda get that some projects with limited backing can’t “get their shit together”, when successful users don’t give them anything. It’s a stupid pattern, and I hope we can break it.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          i think we could bake some form of “free for personal use, paid for corporate use” clause in our foss licenses tbh

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t think that is necessary, as some companies do actually help, either with money or even dedicated staff, which can be as good or better.

            We should push for developers to promote the idea of more help towards FOSS projects, maybe find some hours a month, or send any money saved from not paying for licenses.

          • Kurokujo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s not a terrible idea as long as it’s significantly cheaper than the closed alternatives. I think the biggest issue would be that orgs that pay would expect a certain level of service that a community project might not be able to deliver on.

            • Bizarroland@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Most of the small to mid size companies that I have worked for would choose a larger more established system that costs more even if it offers less over a self-hosted one that they had to pay some sort of fee for.

              Is like this weird idea in the business world that if you’re using Foss systems that it must be completely free, and that the reason why you are using it is because you are broke or cheap.