• Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    If the information was important wouldn’t it already be passed around and expanded upon? The Internet is probably 99% junk, at least the posts I’ve made. Only the good stuff like goatse survives.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    This isn’t inherently bad.

    Some web pages are extraneous, fedundant, or only relevant for a limited period of time. A sign up page for a concert doesn’t need to exist permanently. Consolidating a large website down to fewer pages that are accessible for everyone is a good thing.

    Archiving services that retain web pages that deserve saving are how we should retain that history of the web, but the actual creators don’t necessarily need to indefinitely maintain a web page that becomes obsolete.

    Yes, a lot is lost that could have just continued to exist and archiving is good, but getting rid of clutter is not a bad thing.

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is like the disinvention of the printing press, at least from an archeological perspective.

  • petrescatraian@libranet.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    @funn Online content is, sadly, more vulnerable than we think. All it takes is one server to go down, and the entire website/thing goes bust.