• Amju Wolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because while you do have control (and “copies”) of the source code repository, that’s not really true for the ecosystem around it - tickets, pull requests, …

    If Microsoft decided to fuck you over you’d have a hard time migrating the “community” around that source code somewhere else.

    Obviously depends on what features you are using, but for example losing all tickets would be problematic for any projects.

    Apparently Mozilla won’t be even accepting PRs there so it doesn’t matter much.

    • lysdexic@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because while you do have control (and “copies”) of the source code repository, that’s not really true for the ecosystem around it - tickets, pull requests, …

      The announcement to drop Mercurial quite clearly states that their workflow won’t change and that GitHub pull requests are not considered a part of their workflow.

      Also, that’s entirely irrelevant to start with. Either you care about software freedom and software quality, or you don’t. If you care about software freedom you care about having free and unrestricted access to FLOSS projects such as Firefox, which GitHub clearly provides. If you care about software quality you’d care about the Firefox team picking the absolute best tools for the job that they themselves picked.