• RampageDon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just assumed the Netflix top 10 were movies/shows they were trying to push, not based on actual veiwership.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t get why the streaming services would care what media people watch. Are they pushing stuff that is cheaper to license?

      • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They want to get recommendations just good enough to keep you hooked. If they show you just the objectively best, you would instantly know after seeing the best ones, that the rest of the catalogue is worse and worse.

        This is how Netflix was in the beginning. I actually unsubscribed for a while for yhis reason. Now I’m as hooked as ever, there might still be a few good ones out there - I just need to keep scrolling for a few hours. /s

  • oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Remember when Netflix had a million dollar competition to improve their recommendation system by something like 10%? Remember when they had user ratings and reviews? Remember when they threw it all in the fucking trash?

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The original recommendation engine was amazing. Showed me stuff I loved that I would have never found myself. My favorite example is the French claymation acid trip called “A Town Named Panic”

      Now all I get recommended are shows that are cancelled and that I’ve already watched.