I prefer to use statisics rather than anecdotal evidence. The stack overflow survey shows full stack pretty far down:
I prefer to use statisics rather than anecdotal evidence. The stack overflow survey shows full stack pretty far down:
Why would you think full stack developers make more money in general?
“A”.reverse() === “A”
I imagine it trying to say Earth but getting muffled by the politician
Maybe not next year but there was one year, in one country. https://www.timeanddate.com/date/february-30.html
They want to get recommendations just good enough to keep you hooked. If they show you just the objectively best, you would instantly know after seeing the best ones, that the rest of the catalogue is worse and worse.
This is how Netflix was in the beginning. I actually unsubscribed for a while for yhis reason. Now I’m as hooked as ever, there might still be a few good ones out there - I just need to keep scrolling for a few hours. /s
Might as well do it, I guess…
ESC + (shift) ZZ is faster and also saves your changes!
“It depends” is a good answer, and is in line with me questioning the above comment.
Here’s a link to a recent huge worldwide study: https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2024/work#salary