- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
I find it interesting that there are apparently true believers out there who think the Abram’s is an ontologically godlike tank and that it’s historical record is not the result of overmatched technology and overwhelming air superiority
Ukraine’s lack of experience with such advanced tanks
Love how they do a little victim blaming too
So advanced, the smartest guys from the US are needed to pilot it. Top men!
The slavic brainpan etc etc
Well otherwise they’d have to admit all those doohickeys are overpriced junk
The fact that Ukraine, using antiquated hand-me-downs, still manages to hold off Russia, with access to state-of-the-art technology, is both truly impressive of Ukraine, and truly impressive of Russia (but for different reasons).
meanwhile in the real world https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/attritional-art-war-lessons-russian-war-ukraine
War of attrition? Off to the gulag with you, clearly it’s a special military operation of attrition!
gulag
modern day Russia
Doesn’t understand the difference between a Russian legal term (SMO) and a general military strategy
You seem severely confused. Are you ok?
How can something that legally can not be called a “war” be called “war of attrition”? Does it make sense to use terminology related to wars to something that is not a war? The article specifically talks about “attritional wars”. Are you saying an “attritional war” does not need to be a war?
On the one hand, you seem to be very strict with the exact wording (taking offense at the joking use of “gulag”) , on the othet hand you seem to play it quite loose when it comes to other terms.
