• syfqamr32B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Again, post match whatever these panels or whatever the hell the want to call themselves means fuck all. If these people were so good put them at the VAR duty so that correct call can be made DURING THE MATCH.

  • Ajax_Trees_AgainB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m in awe people are still crying about this. The Liverpool decision last night was worse and the man United decision was about on par and everyone has moved on.

    • milkonyourmustacheB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s being reposted by a United fan, only difference is this is now in a neat little graphic instead of the full report.

    • Wide_Challenge3880B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, I think it’s because people can’t even admit that Arsenal got fucked over that match. There are still people who think the goal was fair.

      Then there’s stories of PGMOL making sure pundits cover the referees

  • TheGoldenPineapplesB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just don’t really get the consistency here.

    I personally have no issue with VAR not being able to rule that the ball went out of play. I think Gabriel was fouled in the build-up and I still don’t see how they didn’t have the correct footage for the offside, but that’s another matter entirely.

    My point is that if there wasn’t enough evidence to rule out whether or not Willock had run the ball out for them to act, then why was Rashford keeping the ball in play against Brighton not given the same advantage? Surely, they had the same level of evidence for that, no?

  • TheAngryGoonerB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They say it isn’t a foul, but I can see him pushing Gabriel with both hands into his back. Are the Premier League’s independent key match incidents panel blind or stupid?

  • Wide_Challenge3880B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that only 3-2 of them said Bruno should have been sent off is super fishy.

    I don’t trust how independent this ‘independent’ panel is.

  • Bugslayer03B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad theyre using that photo of kai instead of point of contact. Ya know with his trailing foot. 100% they only saw that photo in order to get to that red card assumption. Absolute idiots.